Collaborate with Viewpoint and your peers by providing us with your input
Many of us subcontractors are only on prevailing wage jobs sporadically and have been allowed to submit one Non-Performance Report covering multiple weeks. On some federal projects, I have even been instructed to submit only one Non-Performance report AND to number my reports by report number instead of week number ... OR ... skip the Non-Performance report entirely and make notes of the non-performance period on the certified payroll report, numbering all CPRs by report number instead of week number.
Judy Cox
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
YES! We have some project that get put on HOLD for a period of time and they don't want Reports during that period. They want them to pick back up where they left off, so a Hold Button or date range would be nice!
Why don’t the certified payroll reports separate the double-time?!
Judy
I agree that the Non-Performance report should include more project information. As for the numbering and capability to cover multiple weeks, I was shown a way around that, although it requires some extra steps. Save a PDF copy of the first week you need and then you can edit it. When I’m in a hurry, I just edit by hand on the printed copy that I’m signing to send. There’s no law (that I know of) that won’t accept hand written notes and changes.
Judy
The statement of non-performance should indicate the "federal project/contract no." and "project and location" as indicated on header of WH347. The project info indicated within the body is contractor's assigned number and project label.
The normal requirements that I have seen published require a report (Certified or Non-Performance to be filed weekly and that the Payroll No represents how many weeks you have been performing work on the project and numbered sequentially, starting with the first payroll you were on the project.
If you are seeing other federal requirements posted, please attach to this suggestion so I can review. At the moment, we will not look to change how the Payroll number is determined.