Submit Your Suggestions For ProContractor

Collaborate with Viewpoint and your peers by providing us with your input

Auto Create payments for garnishments from payroll batch

Why is it useful, who would benefit from it, how should it work?

  • Mobile Connect
  • Oct 15 2015
  • In Development
  • Attach files
  • Darin Mckeown commented
    July 27, 2021 18:31

    Ahhhh, the simple days of AC (some of which was effective and efficient ). Please get this into ProC sooner rather than later.

  • Julie Dakis commented
    February 17, 2021 23:41

    Huge help to AP. Once PR is posted the garnishment payments are created on the

    AP side. Less appt to forget to make the payments every payroll. Worked great in American Contractor-should have been a priority function in Pro Contractor as well. We have been waiting three or four years for this to be added. Should have been an easy fix a long time ago.

  • Gillian Brown commented
    May 11, 2020 15:02

    I noticed this project was updated in Jan-2019 for implementation on the next release... Is this still being worked on? Is there a tentative release date? This would decrease so many duplicate processes! WE NEED THIS LIKE YESTERDAY!

  • Janet Jacobsen commented
    May 11, 2020 14:54

    This is a feature in American Contractor that I felt was a benefit. It saves time.

  • Lisa Isringhausen commented
    April 06, 2019 11:59

    Re: the invoice description, see Gail’s notes below. The state of NC requirements are a little more elaborate than what we have in SC, but most garnishments have some sort of Case ID Name/Number and or Reference Number that needs to be included on the check. In Maxwell Management Suites Employee Deduction and Fringe Maintenance the field is called Case Number, and it prints on the check. A larger field (more characters for description) would be useful, multiple fields might be better.

  • Gayle Brinkley commented
    March 13, 2019 19:59

    Ok, so it's now in the planning stage.  How much longer till is an actual enhancement.  I have multiple checks I write every week and it is very time consuming to do this.  Also, will you actually do an enhancement to include state and federal withholding deposits?  This would be extremely beneficial as well.

  • Deleted User commented
    January 15, 2019 21:07

    As we are looking into developing this feature, a quick question or 2:

    • Assume that on each fringe and deduction there will be an ability to indicate to generate AP invoices for each check with the selection of a vendor and indicate invoice description.
      • When generating the invoices the distribution line on the invoices will credit AP and debit the Deduction Withheld account or the Fringe Accrual Account respectively
    • Will also have a setting in Payroll setting to indicate which posting group
    • The AP invoices will be generated with a status of Open and not posted

    Any concerns with this approach? Thoughts on the invoice distribution description - don't want to put the employee name - payroll check number?

  • Cheryl Falgoust commented
    January 11, 2019 21:04

    Well that is good news

  • Deleted User commented
    January 11, 2019 20:36

    Cheryl,

    It is currently planned for the next release of ProContractor. Once develop starts this idea will be updated so you can track its progress.

  • Cheryl Falgoust commented
    January 11, 2019 20:32

    Finally, but how long before “planned” and actually implemented? I see some things taking 1-3 years from this step forward.

  • Suzanne Caldwell commented
    December 21, 2018 18:30

    One Invoice per employee would give the most flexibility.

    Then if a user wanted 1 check with all “invoices” listed, they could do that.

    If they want one check per deduction, they could set the Vendor to One Check Per Invoice.

    Best of both worlds as an option.

    Suzanne Caldwell

    Business Consultant

  • Ashlyn Robison commented
    December 21, 2018 18:24

     

    How about one invoice with item lines for each employee?  You could identify each employee by case number, SSN, something like that

  • Deleted User commented
    December 21, 2018 18:17

    Justin,

    In your scenario, if more than 2 employees have the same deduction to the same vendor (e.g. child support) - is the desire for 1 invoice for each employee or 1 invoice with a invoice line item for each employee?

  • Deleted User commented
    December 21, 2018 18:13

    Gayle

    Where is that information to be provided? On the check back to the State? On a report?

  • Gayle Brinkley commented
    December 19, 2018 16:41

    For Child Support Garnishments North Carolina requires the following field: Employee Name,  MPI #, Full SSN, Court File Name and Amount.  I am sure most states have similar required fields.  It would be a real benefit to those of us who have garishments, etc that we must pay weekly.  Just as it would be nice to have this done soon, like in the next upgrade.

  • Kristie Comer commented
    December 19, 2018 16:02

    Agree, what Justin said is what is needed. 

  • Lisa Isringhausen commented
    December 19, 2018 13:28

    Yes, what Justin is saying as far as detail level is exactly right, and that is the way Management Suites does it. Hope this happens soon!

  • Justin Nepper commented
    December 19, 2018 12:54

    There should be a line item for each employee. Basically, each garnishment
    should create its own invoice in the AP side. In a perfect world, there
    would also be the ability to enter a separate identifier that would carry
    forward from week to week such as a case #, ID#, etc. along with the amount
    per employee. This number would be added during the setup of the
    individual garnishment and would not change over the life of the
    garnishment.

    Justin

  • Deleted User commented
    December 14, 2018 21:25

    What level of detail is need on the invoice that is created from the weekly payroll run? 1 distribution with a total, a distribution for each employee?

  • Gayle Brinkley commented
    November 14, 2018 21:20

    So sad, its been 3 years since this was requested has 166 votes and you still haven't decided if you will implement.  Doesn't say much for your company.

  • Load older comments
  • +111

Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;

We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs. Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.

1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 300, Portland, OR 97214 |  800.333.3197  | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Support Policies

© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.